Researching and developing non-traditional analytic methods and communications tools for journalism.

Ver 1.0 Proceedings ON SALE NOW!
Co-directors:
  • Steve Doig - Tempe
  • Tom Johnson - Santa Fe
  • Steve Ross - Boston
    Fellows:
  • Patrick Mattimore - San Francisco & Geneva, Switzerland
  • John R. Sadd - Boston & Santa Fe
  • George T. Duncan - Pittsburgh, PA & Santa Fe

    Recent IAJ publications,
    presentations and workshops
    Postings This Month
    September 2009
    Sun Mon Tue Wed Thu Fri Sat
    1 2 3 4 5
    6 7 8 9 10 11 12
    13 14 15 16 17 18 19
    20 21 22 23 24 25 26
    27 28 29 30
    Year Archive
  • View Article  UPDATED: Inflation Conversion Factors for Dollars 1774 to Estimated 2019

    Here at the IAJ, we have long been a fan -- and user -- of Prof. Robert Sahr's "Inflation Conversion Factors" web site and tools.  We were snoozing at the switch a bit and didn't notice that Sahr updated the site in early June 2009.  Check it out: it's filled with both PDF and Excel data/tools to calculate the comparative costs of most anything from 1774 to 2019.  The site also includes some fun data:

    The charts on the following topics are available either by scrolling down or by selecting the appropriate link:

              Price levels and the US economy

              Millionaires Then and Now

              Pay of Presidents and Members of Congress

         Selected Government-related Items (number of government employees, Social Security and AFDC/TANF; stamp prices, minimum wage, mean and median family income)

              Presidential Election Costs 1860 to 2000

         National Government Budget:  Outlays (Spending), Revenue, Deficits or Surpluses, and National Debt

              Selected Commodity Prices (gasoline and gold) [gasoline revised June 2009, using June 2009 price data and estimated 2009 dollar conversion factors]

              Movies

              Budget Details


     

    View Article  More insights into how and why journos can't deal with data

    This tip comes from our friend Stephan Russ-Mohl, of the European Journalism Observatory.

    Darned Statistics PDF Print E-mail
    by Stephan Russ-Mohl   

    European Journalism Observatory, September 26, 2009

     Many journalists face difficulties in dealing with statistics, and frequently lack the competence to present quantitative information to their publics in easy-to-grasp language.

    This is nothing new, as most journalism textbooks contain tips on how to deal adequately with numbers and percentages. Thus far, these remain rules of thumb. Three U.S. researchers – Coy Callison, Rhonda Gibson and Dolf Zillmann – recently tested these rules. Drawing from 240 students who participated in an experiment, their empirical analysis provides new, surprising insights.

    The test subjects could deal as easily with percentages as with absolute numbers. Contrary to textbooks, they experienced more difficulties when percentages were characterized verbally. For example, “30 percent of the citizens of XY have AIDS” has a meaning different from “3000 of the citizens of XY have AIDS” – but the percentage is no more difficult to grasp and remember. If, instead, the percentage is transformed into the phrase “Three of ten of the citizens of XY have AIDS,” an additional barrier of comprehension is created. The researchers mention, however, that their experiments should be expanded, and that less educated groups still need to be included.

    Coy Callison et al.: How to Report Quantitative Information in News Stories, Newspaper Research Journal, Vol 30/Nr. 2, Spring 2009, 43-55.


     

    Guests are encouraged to browse and search through all of this blog and its subdirectories. Please sign in or register and then add comments to the blog.
    Login
    User name:
    Password:
    Remember me 
    Search
    Helpful Publications
    Recent Book Reviews
    Listed on BlogShares